University : Deakin University UniLearnO is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
Subject Code : NNS5806
Country : Australia
Assignment Task:

Introduction:

Laparotomy is a kind of surgical incision. This is a kind of operation that is done in order to examine the abdominal organs and impart diagnosis in context to any problems. In this study, we find a nurse who is named Mavis. She is a 70-year-old nurse who has suffered a laparotomy in context to an acute bowel obstruction. Her operation was successful, and it was ordinary in context to all the vital signs being within the limits that are normal for health care users.

Body:

Small intestine obstruction is one of the common emergencies of general surgery and usually affects older healthcare service users. The prevalence of morbidity and mortality is higher in small bowel obstruction in the elderly. In recent years, important progress has been made in the prevention and management of bowel obstruction. However, it is rarely known whether these advances have benefited older healthcare service users, especially those who have debilitating or fatal problems as a cause of obstruction, and whether they have any benefit when considering quality and functioning of living. Laparotomy is an operation to cut the abdominal wall. This allows the surgeon to access the contents of the abdomen and helps identify and repair any urgent issues that may occur. These include bleeding (which can be in the liver, spleen, stomach or intestine), or obstruction (blockage) or hole (hole) in the intestine or stomach (Bourgin et al. 2017).
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a typical crisis conclusion in old healthcare service users and increments in parallel with the maturing of old healthcare service users for intense consideration and crisis medical procedure in its crisis division (ED). human services administration clients are determined to have small bowel obstruction within the United Kingdom, small bowel obstruction represents 51% of every earnest lobotomy. Bond and small bowel resection are two of the seven fundamental drivers, which represent 80% of dismalness and mortality related to crisis careful treatment. Crisis medical procedure in the old is related to higher morbidity and mortality than treatment (Chua & Chan, 2019).
Improved treatment of small intestinal obstruction in the general population has resulted in improvement of the management of small intestinal obstruction in recent years. Mathematical tomography (CT) has taken another step in detecting intestinal obstruction and various obstruction etiologies. The addition of water-soluble contrast accurately predicts the success and integrity of conservative treatment success. These diagnostic tools lead to a more tailored approach and reduce immediate activity. Currently, more than 70% of small intestinal obstructions are successfully treated with a conservative approach, potentially avoiding the risk of complicated surgery. Also, small intestinal obstruction has been introduced as an alternative to laparoscopic surgery to reduce potential postoperative illness, but this minimally invasive surgery is not suitable for all healthcare service users and prevents you from having unique complications (Chua & Chan, 2019).
There were no vital signs for Mavis but in the morning post her operation it was seen that her heart rate has increased to 92bpm. The blood pressure of Mavis had decreased to 105/70. Her temperature also subjected 38-degree Celsius. It was observed that her pressure was not normal and was a bit low. However, in this context, it is needed to be mentioned that there could be potential problems in laparotomy. The potential problems in this context are increased pain, swelling, warmth, discharge in context to the fluids from the wound indicates a pertinent infection. In this case, it has been observed that she has not passed her urine for nine hours. There are also certain symptoms that have been observed in Mavis when a health care provider came to check on her vital signs then, she appears anxious, confused and disoriented. Her condition was deteriorating continuously. In this context, Mavis had also started to show the signs of dementia as she still thinks she is a nurse and wishes to resume her duty soon. She gets frustrated very easily and becomes aggressive. 
As a healthcare service provider, I reviewed her medications and identified those medications that affected her behaviour. Later, it was revealed that Mavis was not in his room, and he was in the audience room. When she came to him and found her gown open and she removed the bandage from her wound, around her abdomen and over her surgical wound and was rubbing the anus. In addition, she pulled the ivy cannula, bleeding from the insertion site.
As a healthcare provider, I immediately tried to close her doors to protect her privacy and cover her with the purpose of guiding her to the washroom to share her health needs. Mavis refuses to help and says, "I do not want to wash." I try to invite him to go to the toilet, but he shouts, "I need to go home without touching me, otherwise I'm late for work."
In this context, older healthcare service users compared to younger healthcare service users can be considered to appear in surgery with a better understanding of risk factors and reduced functional levels. Short-term results are the poorest of these. However, most survivors experience symptomatic relief and show an excellent percentage of long-term survival and good quality of life. Therefore, physicians must carefully create a homogeneity risk and benefit profile, taking into account not only age but also several different factors.
The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) reports that elderly healthcare service users (years or older) associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in most emergency risk cases continue to age rapidly, making it clear that factors affecting surgical outcomes in elderly healthcare service users. There is a need for a better understanding. Vulnerability is a relatively new concept that considers the various factors that make a person more vulnerable to increased dependence and death. Studies suggest that high vulnerability scores increase postoperative complications, hospital stabilization, and mortality rates, but most of these studies have been performed on select healthcare service users. Knowledge about the impact of vulnerabilities in emergency situations on healthcare service users can assist physicians and healthcare service users in the decision-making process (Doleman et al. 2019).
Pre-operative risk assessment allows appropriate pre-conscious resource allocation and can assist in patient decision making or in the best interest of the patient. In a selective setting, large surgical healthcare service users in the abdomen should be properly evaluated to identify the exact risk factors that can be resolved before surgical treatment. In an emergency, your content needs to be assessed by targeting resources, adapting to physiology, and making direct decisions about ongoing care, even if you have limited opportunity to do so. A number of perioperative scores have been generated to assist in this process and to facilitate monitoring and analysis of the unit's effectiveness (Jayne et al. 2017).
A recent systematic review of emergency abdominal surgery healthcare service users identified 25 risk assessment tools (published between 1993 and 2013) in 20 studies of 110 healthcare service users and identified Apache II, ASA and P POSSUM- the system reported that the Possum scoring system was the most commonly used scoring. This group reported both preoperative and postoperative risk assessments or hospital in-moron 30 days after a different group of healthcare service users identified from eligible studies, so the efficacy of the equipment could not be reliably reported. ASA grading showed poor discriminatory performance when used as a colorectal surgery risk score comparator in a validated sample of more than 300?? healthcare service users requiring emergency colectomy. Therefore, ASA grades are probably the right tool for veteran companions. The disease rating is the least known score in the age group of 65 years. Parameters include low blood pressure on arrival, presence of chronic illness, and degree of self-care. Importantly, it contains social factors that may reflect markers of vulnerability that are not included in more general scores (Springer.com, 2020).
Other recent studies have found no difference in outcome between young and older healthcare service users with small intestinal obstruction. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution because of the bias in the design and risk selection of elderly healthcare service users, including the most appropriate older healthcare service users. Although treatment of the elderly healthcare service users with small intestinal obstruction has been recognized as somewhat of a movement between cycle and Charybdis, surgical preliminary decisions regarding conservative or surgical treatment need to be made, not following a 2-hour non-surgical treatment. At this early stage, more comprehensive decisions need to be incorporated into the decision process (wjes.biomedcentral.com, 2020).
For elderly healthcare service users, quality in context to life and effectiveness are significant in decision-making, especially in surgery. They should focus on the goals and hopes of the rest of life. Little information is available on the results of life-saving surgery for small bowel obstruction in the elderly. The guidelines in the Guidelines for Small Bowel Obstruction are of little use because they are mostly based on studies in young people. They found that 19% of healthcare service users had pain-related dysfunction following surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction. Unfortunately, the authors excluded healthcare service users aged 75 and older from the study, but given the relatively high risk of complications, surgery to prevent the small intestine in the elderly significantly impairs quality of life and function It is considered. Currently, scoring systems that predict the consequences of small bowel obstruction and include comorbidities are effective (Doleman et al. 2019). These systems do not include functional status, weakness, or age. Therefore, they integrate the treatment performed within the score as a predictor of outcome, not a predictor of optimal treatment. Because of the physiological implications of treatment for elderly healthcare service users, especially the possibility of being "overtime" to undergo surgery, it is becoming increasingly important to include patient choice in decisions about treating small bowel obstruction. High-risk surgical treatment, such as rights, holds promise for different approaches in older and debilitated healthcare service users with indications (Jayne et al. 2017).


This Essay Writing Assignment has been solved by our Essay Writing Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

  • Uploaded By : Alex Cerry
  • Posted on : January 21st, 2019
  • Downloads : 220

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance