University : The Chinese University of Hong Kong UniLearnO is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
Subject Code : LLAW3071
Assignment Task

This assignment is worth 65% of your final mark for this course. Please read the instructions and  the question carefully. 
Please answer the question below. Your answer should not exceed a total of 4000 words (including any internal references). I will not read any text beyond 4000 words. 
This is not a research paper and you are not required to refer to texts outside the course materials, but you may do so if you wish. If citations are needed, please use internal, social science style  references within the text of your answer – these should simply state the author’s name, year  (only if necessary – i.e. if there is more than one reading by the same author), and page number  (e.g. Fredman, 2011, p 15). Do not include footnotes, endnotes or bibliographies. You must use  your own words and should limit direct quotations from other sources. Plagiarism will not be  tolerated, assignments will be screened via Turnitin, and the relevant University rules apply. 
The assignment will be uploaded to Moodle after class on Wednesday, 29 April 2020 and you  must upload an electronic version of your answer to Moodle by 5:00 pm on Saturday, 30 May 2020.  
Three (3) marks per day will be deducted for late submission (i.e. answers submitted after 5:00  pm on 30 May will be considered 1 day late; answers submitted after 5:00 pm on the 31st will be  considered 2 days late, etc.).  
In addition to the criteria mentioned in the question below, when I mark your assignments, I will  consider whether you have done the following: 
1. Provided a thorough analysis of the issues/question based on the available course materials  and bearing in mind the word limit. 
2. Presented clear arguments and supported your arguments and statements with reasons and  evidence. 
3. Used a clear, direct writing style with few or no typos or other avoidable errors. 
4. Covered the main points and not excluded anything important or particularly relevant from  your analysis. 
5. Used quotation marks and internal references where needed - but do not use too many direct  quotes. Please also remember that any plagiarism will result in a failed paper and will be sent to  the Faculty for disciplinary action. 
Good luck and enjoy!
Answer the following question. In total your paper should not exceed 4000 words. In his 2018 chapter on “Equality and Non-discrimination”, Daniel Moeckli observed: 
“Equality can be formulated in different ways, and deciding which concept of equality to use is  not a question of logic but a political choice. In this sense, equality is an ‘empty idea’1 – it does  not answer the questions of who are equals and what constitutes equal treatment. External values,  not derivable from the concept of equality, are necessary to answer these questions. The  challenge, therefore, is to give substance to the abstract notion of equality by translating it into  concrete legal formulations that make clear which forms of unequal treatment are legitimate  because they are based on morally acceptable criteria and which ones are wrongful.” (page 149) 
Choose 4 examples of such “concrete legal formulations” and discuss how they “give substance  to the notion of equality”. Which concept of equality do they promote and why have you reached  that conclusion? Based on your analysis of these examples, do you think that the law can be an  effective tool for achieving substantive equality? Why or why not? 
The “legal formulations” could be international and/or domestic and could be treaty provisions,  international treaty body views, regional or domestic judicial decisions, domestic legislation, etc. They must be drawn from each of the 4 different course topics (i.e. race and ethnicity, sex and  gender, disability, and sexual orientation and gender identity) and may be from the course  materials (including the required readings, class slides, class discussions, etc. Do not choose the  provision(s) or examples you wrote about in your short essays.

 

This LLAW 3071 Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

Eureka! You've stumped our genius minds (for now)! This exciting new question has our experts buzzing with curiosity. We can't wait to craft a fresh solution just for you!

  • Uploaded By : Alon 
  • Posted on : October 10th, 2018

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance