Assignment Task:

FACT SCENARIO 

You are an intern working for a (fictional) new political party, the Aotearoa Reform Party (ARP) which intends to put forward a number of candidates at the forthcoming New Zealand general election on 19 September. ARP’s most prominent member, a wealthy businessman and philanthropist Grantham Morrigan, will be contesting the ?hariu electorate seat in Wellington. Mr Morrigan is polling reasonable well against the incumbent Labour MP Greg O'Connor. He is hoping to win the ?hariu seat which might allow ARP to bring in more MPs, even if the ARP party vote is beneath the 5% threshold. 

Mr. Morrigan and the ARP board are preparing for their inaugural party conference to be held in early July at which they will launch their policy platform for the election. A key issue (and Mr Morrigan’s main reason for launching and funding ARP) is constitutional reform. At a February 2020 press conference, Mr Morrigan said that “New Zealand desperately needs a written constitution” but did not elaborate further. The details of ARP’s policy and proposals for constitutional reform (alongside its other policies) will be finalised at a (closed) board meeting on 3 May. 

Mr Morrigan has asked you – the only ARP intern with a legal background – for help in drafting a board paper dealing with the constitutional reform aspects of the proposed party policy. His instructions to you state “I need a memorandum containing clear, informed analysis on the issues noted below which can include identifying different options and comparative legal and other advantages and disadvantages of each. Your advice should be balanced and supported by relevant academic or judicial authority. I’m interested in your informed opinions, but ultimately, the ARP board will make the final strategy decisions.” 

TOPIC 1: legal status of a written constitution (40% of total marks) 

Mr Morrigan is aware that there are different ways in which a written constitution might be incorporated into New Zealand’s legal system. One option would be for a comprehensive constitution to be passed as ordinary legislation. Another approach would be to protect the new constitution from change by a future government or coalition holding a bare majority in Parliament by using some sort of legislative entrenchment device. 

A separate (but related) question is whether the constitution could be relied on by the courts to invalidate other legislation which is inconsistent with the constitution. 

Your task: topic 1: 

With reference to relevant commentary and caselaw, explain the legal/constitutional implications and comparative advantages and disadvantages for the proposed constitution of: 

i. Entrenchment vs. non-entrenchment; and 

ii. ‘Higher law’ status vs ordinary legislation. 

TOPIC 2: Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (40% of total marks) 

Mr Morrigan expects that issue of the place of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi in a new constitution for New Zealand will be one of the most contentious aspects of any constitutional 

reform process. He has a clear view that Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi should be in the new constitution in some form, but beyond that, has no firm opinions on how that might be done. 

Your task: topic 2: 

With reference to relevant commentary and caselaw, outline at least two different ways in which Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi could be included in a new constitution. Discuss the legal/constitutional implications and comparative advantages and disadvantages of the alternative approaches you describe. With reasons, explain which approach you consider appropriate. 

TOPIC 3: wildcard issue (20% of total marks) 

Mr Morrigan is aware that there are many different topics that might be addressed in a new constitution for New Zealand. They might include – as examples only – protection of private property rights, environmental rights, or restrictions on electoral financing. Mr Morrigan is keen for his own thinking to be challenged, and so has asked you to identify and discuss an issue of your own choice other than the two topics noted above. 

Your task: topic 3: 

With reference to relevant commentary and caselaw (if any), explain: 

i. What specific issue you consider should be included in the new constitution; 

ii. How the issue might be addressed; and 

iii. Why you think it is important to have this issue covered in the document. 

 

This Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

Eureka! You've stumped our genius minds (for now)! This exciting new question has our experts buzzing with curiosity. We can't wait to craft a fresh solution just for you!

  • Uploaded By : Mia
  • Posted on : July 08th, 2019

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance