diff_months: 23

DPIT128: Introduction to Web Technology - Sitewide Search Facilities - Shopping Carts - IT/Computer Science Assignment Help

Notify Me
Added on: 2020-09-23 14:37:01
Order Code:
Question Task Id: 0
Assignment Task

Learning Outcomes
• Ability to assess the technical design ofB2C eCommercewebsites
• Ability to evaluate non-technical aspects relating tothe end-user experience
• Abilityto measure and categoriseWCAG 2.1compliancein relation to the above
• Experience providingjustifiable recommendations for the improvement of commercial websites
• Experience compiling a formal report to communicate these recommendations to stakeholders
Submission Instructions
Submit a single Microsoft Word document using the “Assignment 6” submission facility on Moodle. Please name your document as STUDENTNUMBER.docx (where STUDENTNUMBER is the 7-digit number shown on your student card).
Please be aware of the following:
1. Late submissions will incur an awarded mark deduction of 10% for each day late.
2. Submissions more than 3 days late will not be marked (a zero will be automatically awarded).
3. If you need an extension, please apply for academic consideration before the assignment due date/time. The UOW College Academic Consideration Policy can be found at the following URL:
4. Plagiarism is treated seriously. If we suspect that work has been copied, ALL students involved are likely to be awarded a mark of zero for the assignment. 
Assessment Overview
This assessment requiresa critical evaluation of two (2) separate eCommerce websites. These mustprovide a Business-to-Consumer(B2C)service that allows for customers to purchase items directly from avendor online. Some well known examples of B2C eCommerce include Woolworths, JB Hi-Fi, Bunnings, Jaycar ElectronicsandOfficeworks.While studentsare free to select thewebsites of their choice, the following technological requirements must be metfor the selection to be valid.
Please be advised that Consumer-to-Consumer(C2C)exchanges such as eBay and Alibaba
areNOT valid selections for this assessment.
HTML Forms
This requirement can range from a simple registration form all the way through to the more complex examples used for settlementand fulfillment(e.g. payment and shipping details). The latter options may bemore prevalent as some eCommerce websites provide‘guestcheckouts’ that do not require anyregistrationbeforehand.
Shopping Carts
The vast majority of B2C eCommerce sites will utilise some form of shopping cart. These allow for items to be ‘aggregated’ before the checkout process begins. Most online shopping carts will have innovative features that allow for the management ofinclusions. The more advanced varieties mayeven offera preview of anypricing adjustments based on active specials (e.g. buy one get anotherat 20% off).
Sitewide Search Facilities
This feature should, at the least, allow the consumer to search the entire range of products that are available online. However, the full scope and functionality of search facilities will vary across different websites. A thorough exploration should also include filtering and sorting capabilities that may be used to present anyresults in a more convenient format.
Your assessment must include, but notbe limited to, these three (3)requirements. Some additional consideration must also be given to the extent of WCAG 2.1compliance. This shouldaddressaspects of eachwebsite’s technical construction (e.g. the inclusion of labelelementswithin all HTML forms) along withsome of the more usage-centric considerations (i.e.overall user-friendliness and shopping experience). As such, students will be expected to review the information available at the following URLs:https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/
ThisW3C information source will introduceand contextualise the WCAG 2.1standard. Although we haveexplored these at several/specific points during the lectures, the information contained herein provides a much broader view that encompasses the purposeand intention of this standard along withthe success criteria (including‘A-AAA’ ratings) it applies. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/glance/
Thissecond W3C information source provides a summarised description of each WCAG principle(four in total)along with the guidelines that relate to each. This document simplifies the process of applying the WCAG as a whole and will greatly assist with any evaluation that is focused on theextent of compliance. https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials
This third and considerably more practicalresource shouldsupport an extralayer of technical detail.The many tutorialscovered on this siteexploreaspects such as page structure, navigation menus, tables, forms and carousels (commonly used for advertising). In each case, the best practices for WCAG complianceareexaminedin the context of web design/programming.
As with any business information system, eCommerce websites must collect, store, process and transmit sensitive data. This typically includes authentication details, payment details, shipping and handling details, shopping preferences and even purchase histories. As such, it is important to also address privacy and security factors within your critical evaluation.These should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following aspects:
Publication/provision of any relevant privacy and security policies
Publication/provision of any relevant information handling, storage and sharing policies
The extent and strength of security used (e.g. digital certificates and SSL encryption)
Any endorsements provided by third-party ‘trust accreditation’entities such as BBB or TRUSTe
Assessment Deliverable
As mentioned in the assessment overview, your submission must critically evaluate two (2)Business-to-Consumer eCommerce websites with a view towards making recommendations for improvement. Your evaluation should identify any problems, shortcomingsor other potential issues prior to making the case for such recommendations.
The assessment deliverableis to be word processed using Microsoft Word and presented in the style of a formal report. Consequently, your submission must include each of the following sections/components:
1. Title Page
2. Table of Contents
3. Introduction
4. Body (containing the evaluation findings and accompanying recommendations for both websites)
5. Conclusion
6. Reference List
All references/citations used within this report should comply with the UOW Harvard referencing style. This includes references to the WCAG 2.1 or any other accessibility materials (such as those produced byWebAIM).Please note that this requirement also extends to any references obtained fromonlinevalidationand evaluation tools such as those listed below.
W3C HTML Validator
W3C CSS Validator
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
While the final report has a minimum length requirement of 1500 words, the expectation is that all findings and subsequent recommendations will be clearly expressed, comprehensive in nature and well supported by source material(s) whenever possible.


This DPIT128: IT/Computer Science Assignment has been solved by our IT/Computer Science Experts at TVAssignmentHelp. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

  • Uploaded By : Mia
  • Posted on : September 23rd, 2018
  • Downloads : 0

Notify Me

Review Question

Please enter your email

Can't find what you're looking for?

Choose a Plan


80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing


30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%


20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more