Country : | Australia |
---|
Objectives of these activities:
There are numerous research centres and groups around the world currently using bionanotechnology to achieve breakthroughs in healthcare, environmental monitoring, food production and in agriculture. Their research covers numerous fields such as targeted drug and gene delivery, regenerative medicine, therapeutics and diagnostics, via both in vivo and in vitro methods, along with biosensors, medical imaging and biomedical devices that interface with living tissues. By examining the set topic question for the literature review and delivering a critical appraisal of one research paper (details appear below), you will gain an understanding of different types of nanoparticles, and of the complex interactions that arise between them and living systems. By reading, writing and critically appraising this topic you will also gain an understanding of the developments and discoveries in this field, and an insight into the profiles of various research teams. This is useful for possible future contacts and work connections. It is also imperative that you are cognisant of new developments in the Bionanotechnology field and are capable of navigating through the huge body of information that is available via the internet.
TASK 2: Instructions for the Written Literature Review and Progress Components (45%):
• Completed written literature review, submitted to Turn-it-in, by no later than 10:00pm Friday, 23rd October, 2020
• 2500 words maximum in ‘Calibri’ or ‘Arial’ font (size 12 and 1.5 line spacing) • A penalty will be applied to late submissions (10% will be deducted from the final mark of this component, for every 24 hours it is late)
• Checkpoint deadlines for Progress Tasks:
o Selection of topic area (28th August)
o Summary list of 10 articles (4th September)
o Literature review skeleton (25th September)
This assignment is a writing review and reading-techniques exercise designed to familiarise you with the current literature in the field of Bionanotechnology. Using recent literature (published within last 7-8 years) discuss the medical application of nanoparticles (<100nm) used in the treatment or diagnosis of disease associated with the human respiratory system. In your review focus on the role of the protein corona and particle characteristics (eg. size and shape) that influence the particle targeting, localisation and cellular effects. You should also include some examples of the advantages this technology has over current treatments or diagnostics.
The critical literature review (2500 word limit) should be written in the style of a report for presentation to scientific colleagues. The review should provide an introductory overview of the selected topic, that logically leads to a critical appraisal of the current literature. All information included in the report must be referenced appropriately using Harvard style or other acceptable scientific referencing style. It is important that all points are written in the student’s own words (paraphrased) and are supported with correct citations. All documents for this assessment will be submitted to Turn-it-in to check for plagiarism.
Use of websites should be kept to a minimum and are not included in the reference count which should be a minimum of 20 research papers (not including review articles). References older than 10 years should only be used on rare occasions when they are the primary source (e.g. “this nanoparticle was first created by author, 1985”). The reference list should start on a new page at the end of the literature review. Students’ will also need to fill in and insert the cover page provided on UTSonline for their literature review.
To help student’s construct their literature review, there will be multiple checkpoints and deadlines throughout semester. These checkpoints include:
1. Selection of nanoparticle topic. Due: 28th August, 2020 – these are to be uploaded on UTSOnline. Once chosen, topics cannot be changed unless approved by the coordinator.
2. A list of 10 research articles directly related to the selected topic. Due: 4th September (uploaded to UTSOnline).
3. A skeleton of the literature review. Due: 10:00 pm Friday, 25th September, submitted via UTSOnline. This includes the main subheadings for each section. There will need to be a paragraph (75 – 100 words each) outlining each section. The relevant research articles / references to be used in each section should also be included.
During each of the scheduled Friday workshop presentation sessions, there will time allocated for one-on-one discussion and feedback on progress in the research and writing of the literature review.
Professional skills and their appropriate application: Understanding of plagiarism, correct referencing style applied (10%)
- Inclusive of a definition of the topic
- Provides a broad introduction of the topic at the start of the review
- Correctly addressed the set question and requirements of the task
- Demonstrates synthesis and critical analysis of the information presented
- Developed a discussion/argument with final conclusive remarks
- The material presented goes beyond simply listing relevant information but rather develops a coherent overall story showing the relevance of the work presented/reviewed. Places this information into a broader context covering the field of Bionanotechnology. Critical appraises the information and draws conclusions supported by evidence from the literature. Comes to a logical conclusion based upon the information presented
- Included detailed research of at least 20 research papers (not including review articles)
- The review was written in a coherent and clear manner, free from grammatical and spelling errors - There was a logical flow to the review with a clear introduction and supporting evidence to develop ideas/discussion/argument of the work presented
- Final concluding remarks/summary/overview provided
This Science and Maths Assignment has been solved by our Science and Maths Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.