University : Robert Kennedy College UniLearnO is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
Subject Code : CRKC7007
Assignment Task
 
 


General Instructions – Please read carefully
You are required to complete the assessment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the end of Unit 6. Your grade will be based 100% on this final document, to which you will also receive written feedback.
In addition, by the end of Unit 3 you must upload a paper that will consolidate your learning from the first three units and prepare you for the final assessment (see Interim Assignment, on the final page of this document). This paper will not be graded, but it is an important way of monitoring your progress and preparing you for the final assessment. Formative feedback on your draft will be given, and general feedback with respect to the topic(s) covered in the interim assignment will be posted on the Forum after Unit 3 has been completed.
Your paper must have a clear structure and include:
Cover page (an example is available to you in Induction/Unit 4)
Abstract (no more than 150 words in a single paragraph)
Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary)
A declaration of authenticity – confirming that you are the sole author of the assessment and that you have acknowledged all of your
List of References cited in the text – at Master level you must use in-text citations to support your arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work. You are required to use the Harvard system for this.
You should read the criteria for assessment section below carefully to ensure that within your assessment you have addressed all of the issues for which marks are available.
Your word count, excluding cover page, abstract, table of contents and reference list no more than 3500 words in total. UoC have strict regulations regarding word limits – the penalties for exceeding them are set out in section 3 here https://www.cumbria.ac.uk/media/university-of-cumbria-website/content-assets/public/aqs/documents/academicregulations/Academic-Regulations---Appendix-3c.pdfYou must submit your work by 11.59 CET (Zurich) time on the last day of the module. UoC have strict regulations for submission of work, and the penalties for late submission are set out in section 2 of the link above.
Submissions should be machine readable and in MS-Word readable formats only please don’t use pdf or other formats. submit only one file, and include any Excel analysis as images, not embedded files
Please ask any questions about the interim assignment and final assessment in the Forum.

Final Assessment
For the final assessment you are to choose your own case study and describe and critique its Leadership for Sustainability. You should
Analyse the nature of leadership in the organisation and consider its relationship with established theory
Evaluate the extent to which global environmental pressures impact on the case study and analyse the ways in which the leadership is dealing with those pressures
Undertake a critical appraisal of the ways in which tools and theories relating to sustainability are or could be used in your case study
Critically evaluate the extent to which your case study are developing strategies for sustainability
For the case study, you can choose ANY organisation, public, private or not?for?profit.
Apply as many of the concepts of leadership and sustainability covered in this module as you can. You should recall in summary the concepts you use, but do not spend long describing them – we are looking for APPLICATION of the concepts to your case study, not descriptions of them.
Remember, we are not looking for an essay on leadership or sustainability, nor for a series of definitions, nor for a summary of the material covered in the module – we are looking to see how well you can use the concepts you have learned about to analyse the operation of your case study organisation
Another reminder to use the Assessment Criteria (below) as a guide to ensure you cover all the critical areas for which marks are available.
Criteria for assessment:
Criteria Distinction >70% Merit 60-69% Pass 50-59% Fail 40- 49% Bad Fail < 40%
Critically assess competing theories of leadership and evaluate their application to current issues
25% of Marks Full and critical assessment of all relevant theories in the context of chosen case study Good critical assessment of most relevant theories in the context of chosen case study Competent assessment of most important theories in context of chosen case study Limited assessment an/or understanding of theories and/or failure to apply to context of chosen case study Little or no understanding or assessment of theories and failure to apply to context of chosen case study
Reflect critically on the contextual complexity of global environmental pressures on countries and individual organisations, and evaluate the resultant challenges for leaders
20% of Marks Sophisticated reflection on the impact of pressure on chosen case study with full and insightful evaluation of the resultant challenges for leaders in that organisation Appropriate reflection on the impact of pressure on chosen case study with good evaluation of the resultant challenges for leaders in that organization. Appropriate reflection on the impact of pressure on chosen case study with some evaluation of the resultant challenges for leaders in that organization. Limited reflection on or lack of understanding of the impact of pressure on chosen case study and/or limited evaluation of the resultant challenges for leaders in that organization. Little or no reflection on or complete lack of understanding of the impact of pressure on chosen case study and/or little or no evaluation of the resultant challenges for leaders in that organization.
Undertake a critical appraisal of the use of theories and tools of sustainability, such as Lean Systems, the Triple Bottom Line or Environmental Sustainability to address the need for a systematic and evidence-based approach
25% of Marks Full and sophisticated evaluation of the use of sustainability strategies applied by leaders in the chosen organization. Sound and detailed evaluation of the use of sustainability strategies applied by leaders in the chosen organization Appropriate evaluation of the use of sustainability strategies applied by leaders in the chosen organization Limited evaluation of the use of sustainability strategies applied by leaders in the chosen organization and/or limited understanding of those strategies Little or no evaluation of the use of sustainability strategies applied by leaders in the chosen organization and/or little or no understanding of those strategies
Critically evaluate means for organisations to develop sustainable strategies, and assess the emerging development from corporate social responsibility to shared value
20% of Marks Full and sophisticated analysis of the ways
in which the chosen organization is addressing issues of sustainability Full analysis of the ways in which the chosen organization is addressing issues of sustainability Adequate analysis of the ways in which the chosen organization is addressing issues of sustainability Limited analysis of the ways in which the chosen organization is addressing issues of sustainability Little or no analysis of the ways in which the chosen organization is addressing issues of sustainability
Present a paper using language, referencing and presentation that maintains the confidence of the reader in your academic credibility
10% of Marks Fully and appropriately referenced, well presented. Excellent use of language.
Meets all academic conventions.
Bibliography accurate. Very good referencing, well presented and clear use of language and sound use of academic conventions.
Bibliography some minor errors Generally well referenced, well presented and clear use of language but with some errors in academic conventions.
Bibliography
Some errors and omissions Inadequately presented with inconsistent academic conventions. Poor use of language.
Bibliography major errors and omissions Little referenced work, poorly presented and very unclear language with serious errors.
Does not meet academic conventions.


This CRKC7007 Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

  • Uploaded By : Roman
  • Posted on : July 08th, 2019
  • Downloads : 236

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance