University : Middle East College UniLearnO is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
Subject Code : COMP1004
Assignment Task:

Module Learning Outcomes

The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully 

1) Apply the tools of structured analysis within a process of systems development 

2) Describe the different phases of systems design 

3) Evaluate appropriate input and output design considerations 

Assignment Objective 

This is an individual case study aimed to apply analysis and designing techniques during system development. 

Assignment Tasks 

1) Submit a work proposal for this assignment or before 4-September-20 (23:59) which must include: 

• Understanding of deliverables –initial understanding of solution to task2. 

• Timeline for completion of the given tasks. 

• List of resources 

The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle. 

Task 2: 

In the first assignment of System Analysis and Design Concepts for the current semester, you have already completed the initial investigation of an Information System that was selected for you. In this task, you will conduct all activities and prepare all deliverable products associated with the System analysis and design process for the same system that you have studied in assignment1. At the conclusion of your study, you will prepare a comprehensive, high-quality assignment report containing your results. You will also design a prototype model (Design only) of your proposed system using a suitable interface of your choice. Note that all diagrams must be drawn using suitable software. 

1. Analyze the user requirements that have been studied in the first assignment by drawing the following diagrams: 

• Context diagram which includes a relevant name for the system, at least 3 external entities and 12 data flows. 

• Analyze the most important system functions by drawing the DFD level 0. You need to include at least 4 major processes, 4 data stores, 3 external entities and 16 data flows. 

2. Analyze the conditions that are related to the studied system using one of the following tools:

• Decision Tree with a minimum of 8 conditions and 4 actions 

Or 

• Decision Table with a minimum of 4 conditions, 4 actions and 4 alternatives. 

3. Define at least 10 data elements that are present in the previous diagrams using a data dictionary. 

4. Design at least four input/output forms that visualize 4 different user interfaces in consistency with the previous diagrams. For each form, you need to add an appropriate IPO chart. 

5. Write a reflective writing section that summarizes the contents of your work, learning from the MOOC course that is shared with you on Moodle and evaluation of your experience. 

Viva: There are no separate marks for viva. The assignment will be judged based on the knowledge and understanding of the student. 

Note: 

(i) All the marks will depend on viva voce. 

Your assignment should include a cover page indicating your name, title of work, course, date, and name of the instructor. Make sure that drawings are clear and legible. Keep in mind that you will be judged on visual appearance, in addition to grammatical correctness and quality of writing. The text must be well-structured, with paragraphs, full sentences and all the other features of a well-written report. Your report must not consist of itemized lists of points. The report should not exceed 20 pages (not counting references, appendices, figures or tables.) Text font size should be 12 points. 

Rules & Regulations: <Below given are only suggestive. It may be edited as per the needs of the assignment/module> 

• All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. 

• The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. 

• Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. 

• Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. 

• Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier. 

Guidelines: 

<Below given guidelines are only suggestive. It may be edited as per the needs of the assignment/module> 

• Assignment must be computer typed. ? Font - Times New Roman ? Font – Style - Regular ? Font - Size - 12 ? Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline. 

• Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable software. 

• Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings from group work. 

• You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources. 

Important Policies to be followed 

1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*: MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled. 

All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below mentioned categories: 

1. Plagiarism 

2. Malpractice 

3. Ghost Writing 

4. Collusion 

5. Other cases 

If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of plagiarism. 

1. Plagiarism 

A. First offence of plagiarism 

I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. 

II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. 

III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be , then that assessment will be awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark. 

B. Second offence of plagiarism 

If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 

2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion 

A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion 

If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module and shall be required to re-register the module 

B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion 

If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 

3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation 

If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 

4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: 

If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 

5. Other cases 

If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. 

6. Types/Variations of Cases: 

I. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. II. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as 

having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students III. If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. IV. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: 

a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy.

b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that student alone.

c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment. 

* for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook. 

2. Late Submission Regulations: 

<Following content to be added for UG> 

It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. 

As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission.  

Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 

<Following content to be added for PG> 

It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. 

Late submission penalty for PG modules shall be imposed 10% deduction of the marks obtained for work submitted up to 1 week (5 working days) after the due date for submission and for work submitted after this, but up to 2 weeks (10 working days) late, student will lose a further 10% of the obtained mark (i.e. 20% overall). Work tendered for submission more than 2 weeks (10 working days) after the due date will not be accepted and an absence will be recorded for the assessment concerned. This will count as a failed attempt and may result in failing the module overall. 

Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 

3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy 

To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the following shall apply. 

• Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions. 

• Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. 

• Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. 

• Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the commencement of research. 

• Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the intended purpose of research. 

 

ASSESSMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA

20200831071942AM-238498461-1927680902.png

20200831071942AM-1086519562-646823419.png

20200831071942AM-1988557130-1410035213.png

 

This COMP1004: IT/Computer Science Assignment has been solved by our IT/Computer Science Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

Eureka! You've stumped our genius minds (for now)! This exciting new question has our experts buzzing with curiosity. We can't wait to craft a fresh solution just for you!

  • Uploaded By : Clay
  • Posted on : August 31st, 2018

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance