Assignment Task :

It requires students to write a research essay on the recent Australian Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial services. 

This is an independent research task, which broadly aligns to regulation of auditing, audit quality, auditor independence and meeting user expectations. It is expected that the interim report will form the basis of your submission but additional reading and the sourcing of information from newspaper articles and the internet is required.

The format of the assignment is to be in essay form (report style not required), sub-headings are encouraged, 12 font calibre or times new roman styles are recommended and use of the Harvard style of referencing is also required (please seek assistance from the librarian if necessary).

You are to write a 3,000 word essay, using a minimum of 10 different references. Specific requirements include answering the questions within Part A, Part B, Part C and Part D. Each of the four parts comprise of ¼ of the assignment. The overall marks will be out of 30 marks. Each part should comprise of approximately 700-750 words. Some suggested minimum prompts are included below each part, which MUST be addressed and fully discussed. A brief introduction and conclusion of no more than 100 words each is required. A list of references/bibliography is also required. However, an abstract and table of contents are optional.

 

Part A – Background, impetus, rationale, momentum and support and/or resistance: 

  • What is the purpose of audit quality for big business and discuss whether it been successful in Australia? 

  • Describe what is the purpose of a Parliamentary Committee? 

  • What were the motivations for the inquiry? 

  • Was there any resistance to the Joint Parliamentary Committee? If so, who from and why? 

  • How was the information collected?


 

Part B – Interim findings, revelations:

  • What have been the key findings of the Committee to date? Discuss any specific examples, which have been identified as having breached professional and ethical standards.

  • What conflicts of interest are apparent? 

  • What threats to independence were discussed?

  • What is the auditors ‘duties in relation to a GPFR? 

  • Has there been any evidence of systemic audit failure in Australia?

 

Part C – User expectations, scope of the audit, digital financial reports:

  • Who are the likely stakeholders for the Parliamentary report?

  • What are the roles of ASIC, AUASB, FRC, Treasury, Professional bodies? 

  • What is your opinion on the findings to date? 

  • What impacts and reforms are likely because of the Parliamentary Committee, including discussion of self-regulation etc. Will these reforms be positive / negative and who will they most likely impact? 

  • How has the scope of the audit changed?

  • What changes have occurred in relation to the expectation gap?

  • What is the current status of digital reporting?


 

Part D – Global awareness, globalisation, cross-cultural awareness and comparisons in global financial markets: 

  • Given that the Inquiry was relevant to only Australia how do you see the ethics and levels of professionalism varying between countries? Are the issues that have been exposed by this committee unique to Australia, or are they typical issues faced by our profession, regardless of culture, nationality and background? What standards should Australia be upholding based on what mechanisms and controls and how do these compare with overseas? Discuss using some international comparative examples. 

The essay is to be submitted to the Assignment 2 drop box, in the Brightspace resources. 

Any work you submit will be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism. 

 

This Auditing Assignment has been solved by our Auditing Experts at UniLearnO. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

Eureka! You've stumped our genius minds (for now)! This exciting new question has our experts buzzing with curiosity. We can't wait to craft a fresh solution just for you!

  • Uploaded By : Grace
  • Posted on : November 24th, 2018

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance